<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Image Entertainment Is Yet Another Busted Buyout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedealsleuth.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/image-entertainment-is-yet-another-busted-buyout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedealsleuth.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/image-entertainment-is-yet-another-busted-buyout/</link>
	<description>Disrespectfully tracking mergers, buyouts and other bad deals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:20:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thedealsleuth</title>
		<link>http://thedealsleuth.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/image-entertainment-is-yet-another-busted-buyout/#comment-3624</link>
		<dc:creator>thedealsleuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedealsleuth.wordpress.com/?p=91#comment-3624</guid>
		<description>Fred Schruers wrote a follow-up article on Bergstein in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/the-hollywood-deal/2008/06/04/bad-boy-bergsteins-union-blues&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Conde Nast Portfolio&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Schruers wrote a follow-up article on Bergstein in <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/the-hollywood-deal/2008/06/04/bad-boy-bergsteins-union-blues" rel="nofollow">Conde Nast Portfolio</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Cubano</title>
		<link>http://thedealsleuth.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/image-entertainment-is-yet-another-busted-buyout/#comment-3367</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cubano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedealsleuth.wordpress.com/?p=91#comment-3367</guid>
		<description>As far as I can tell, BTP does NOT own 38% of the stock. Rather, they have &quot;beneficial ownership&quot; of those shares on account of management and Image Investors (Kluge&#039;s company) agreeing to vote in favor of the acquisition. This is an important distiction, as it means BTP has thus far put only the $3M into trust for this deal, alongside the distribution deal. BTP has NOT bought 38% of the stock. If they had, I&#039;m sure the deal would have gone through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can tell, BTP does NOT own 38% of the stock. Rather, they have &#8220;beneficial ownership&#8221; of those shares on account of management and Image Investors (Kluge&#8217;s company) agreeing to vote in favor of the acquisition. This is an important distiction, as it means BTP has thus far put only the $3M into trust for this deal, alongside the distribution deal. BTP has NOT bought 38% of the stock. If they had, I&#8217;m sure the deal would have gone through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
